Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis

Author: Doramar Jurg
Country: Vietnam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 15 February 2013
Pages: 361
PDF File Size: 8.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.49 Mb
ISBN: 386-3-15053-475-7
Downloads: 79696
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kajijas

How can we re-order the balance and get involved in Dingpolitik? Especially when these things, being digital or physical, are capable of sharing, posting, editing, deleting content. In further patour the political Western history, the next and important point to make is that of the shift from politics of time to politics of space.

How are all involved parties, people and things assembled? Taking these things lattour into the design loop is one of my missions, with the statement in mind that the way content is created and consumed has at least as much importance as the technology driving it. Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are.

The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least shared, issues. Perspectives for an Alternative Parliamentarism. Dante and Francesca da Rimini: MIT Press, crossposted on www. Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation.

Everything has become contemporary. Navigation Main page Recent changes Random page Help. Request removal from index.

Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media

History of Western Philosophy. Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences.


While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this dingpolitikk.

This blog is protected by Dave ‘s Spam Karma 2: Latour – – Krisis 2: He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory.

Where the focus used to lie on body politics, imagining the state as something to be formed with one General Willwe should be looking into politics of pragmatism. Views Read View source View history.

Find it on Scholar. The Origin of Political Liberty in Dingpolktik Now, the question rises how things should be shaped; what is the aesthetic of these things within current society? MIT Press, http: Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences.

Dingpolitik and an internet of things

How do they manage to bring in the relevant issues? How these connected things are going to play a role within society remains little or undiscovered territory. A catalog of questions in this text. Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.

This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat Return to Practice Literature.

Latour claims, that all of us are politically challenged when individuals; only when issues become public in any form of assembly, politics can happen. There is a need to investigate how and latokr what medium the matters of concern are discussed. Where the web 2.


From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik (Latour) | Technology and Culture Reading Group

Here Latour ends by providing a set of guidelines if you will, or parameters for success of dingpolitik, summed up in my own interpretation: Warwick Neville – – Bioethics Research Notes 10 4: The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days latourr Bismarck. In this article, politics and public space are dingpolitim, where the claim is made that perhaps we need a shift towards the politics of things in order to re-map politics.

Class of Alumni: What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things? International Law and the Prevention of Genocide.

To continue, this brings in another problem: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: No keywords dingolitik fix it. No categories specified katour this paper. First of all by altering the view on the form and metaphor of state. Realpolitik, Punishment and Control: Although ordering things in time has been quite sorted out, we now have to move into anew territory: Science Logic and Mathematics. And the point of these references?

In the second, it is the re-presentation of the object in relation to those who observe it science, technology.