CARLOS SKLIAR LA EDUCACION QUE ES DEL OTRO PDF
La Educación (Que Es) Del Otro by Carlos Skliar at – ISBN – ISBN – Novedades Educativas – Report. El cuidado del otro de Carlos Skliar. PC. Paola Clavijo. Updated 18 April Transcript. EL CUIDADO. DEL OTRO. GRACIAS. Choose a template. “La educación es el lugar de la relación, del encuentro con el otro. Es esto lo que es en primer lugar y por encima de cualquier otra cosa. Es esto lo que la hace.
|Published (Last):||4 March 2011|
|PDF File Size:||5.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is clear that the question of financing of public policies in education must be the object of careful discussion.
La Educacion (Que Es) del Otro
The report encountered, as we have already mentioned, an insurmountable difficulty: Here I would like to introduce three brief depictions of the idea of inclusion as an aperture and as an opening. Perhaps inclusion will allow us to rediscover an educational ethics in both of them.
The dkliar one, that in the recent past might have been considered as typical in special education, is related to the teaching of how to live, i. Sometimes when debates are carried out in legal terms, one tends to forget that rights are every person’s property, we are not the ones who enable or disable a dkliar right, rights belong to every one of us, to any human being that should be ethically considered as preceding our own selves.
If there is no affection in inclusion we would be creating a far too paradoxical scenario: Inclusion is assumed, in most cases, from the point of view of a set of indisputable rights: But with this general and fuzzy assertion, complexity and seriousness quickly get diluted. Should se be included? This perception is peculiar, though of course perfectly justifiable. I have tried from the very beginning to state that the most serious problem is the huge number of disabled persons that are not part of the educational system.
: Carlos Skliar: Books
Immediately, we feel tempted to answer ” it involves all of us “. In any case, any previous preparation, any anticipation, makes up a technical tool, a certain degree of rationality, but that does not necessarily work as an ethical positioning of the teacher in relation to the others. Whose responsibility is, then, the inclusion problem? To what extent there has been an increase in drop-out rates because students did not educacipn adequate pedagogical singularities for them in common non-special institutions.
In any case, eudcacion should rather talk about being predisposed, or expressed in a more emphatic terms, we should talk about “being available”, in particular, in the sense of gainsaying and placing under suspicion the archetypical idea based on the belief of the existence of common, normal children. Somehow, it seems to become clear that all students must be together within in the educational system but we have not yet developed a firm standpoint regarding the event itself, skliaf pedagogical relationship as such.
However, it is possible to affirm that most countries have had some resources in this sense, but they have only been used for the implementation of partial and insufficient mechanisms of teacher education and training 3. Thus, this is how we should interpret it in the mouths of those who utter the word “inclusion” regardless of the meaning we attribute to the word inclusion.
Books by Carlos Skliar
This is apparent even when we perceive ew disciplinary transformation and the discursive transvestism that is denoted by the passage from special education to “attention to diversity”.
The different are subjects that are pointed at, singled out, whose description is the result of a long process of differential construction and invention.
This discrepancy arises, fundamentally, from the fact that for NGOs perhaps because they are associations of parents or relatives of disabled ohro the diagnosis is much more severe and the need for a solution more urgent, while for State Agencies everything would be “in the process of being solved.
Perhaps we should consider as valid the following ethical-discursive position: And even though at the beginning of this experience of inclusion, in its accessibility, there is a deletion of the norm, the fact that the difference keeps being a difference, might induce the creation of novel forms of standardization.
Meanwhile ethical reason is giving in, drowning in its own dilemmas, disappearing as a primordial and universal value. It must be remembered that the opinions regarding the alleged anachronism of special education were induced, amongst other reasons, precisely by virtue of hyper-specialization, i.
But it is also true that information collected in the report alludes to two very different issues: We cannot be together without developing mutual affection. Jean-Luc Nancy, To be singular pluralMadrid: A huge number of situations concerning educational inclusion has been resolved exclusively by legal means.
Then one might ask: On a wrongly framed problem and an unbearable reality Autor: And it ee not just a matter of proclaiming policies of universal access to institutions, unrestricted access of all disabled personas to schools, but at the same time, within the same timeframe, creating a thinking pattern and a sensitivity associated to the meaning of being together, the why and wherefore of oteo together, the conception of being together.
In the scholar tradition there seems to persist a marked attachment to thematic compartmentalization, as when people “talk” about drugs, or about drug-addicts, but nobody speaks with them. Doubtlessly, looking at the collected data induces at least, several sleepless nights.
Books by Carlos Skliar (Author of No Tienen Prisa Las Palabras)
What is your name? Why, as teachers, it is not possible to be responsible and to be available to someone, regardless of language, race, religion, or body? But this is done ea the same time as one trips over the first stone, qhe the first obstacle is encountered, namely, not being able to determine the real extent of the problem. What is, then, the problem?
Secondly, the idea of inclusion should be founded on the parents’ and their relatives’ freedom to choose the educational system adequate for their children. And then to be able to think, as Qque mentioned earlier: In this line of thought, it becomes necessary to reflect not only on the need to find strategies to preclude initial exclusion, but also on those that may help to prevent students from dropping out.
Far from this situation the idea of being together entailed by inclusion should always imply affection. We e in an era characterized by over-abundance of juridical reason and a clear lack ethical debate. That is why teachers perceive these transformations under the im possible demand of having to carry out heroic acts, huge exploits, excessive actions. In principle, this affirmation is a direct way of precluding people from identifying inclusion as a movement that depends entirely on the special education system, its institutions, professionals, families and on their knowledge.